Paid family leave washington12/23/2023 ![]() Mothers were 31 years old, on average, with an average age of 28 at first birth. ![]() The total sample is 597,384 mothers, of whom 74,317 gave birth in the third quarter of 2004 and, thus, represent the intervention group the remainder gave birth in other quarters or other years between 20. The statistical models control for quarter and year of child’s birth and pre-birth characteristics of the mother like age, marital status, employment, and earnings they also include individual fixed effects for mothers. The authors use a time series analysis to compare outcomes from 2001 through 2015 for mothers who gave birth in the third quarter of 2004 to those of mothers who gave birth in other quarters or years. The study focuses on women who, in 2001, were at least 18 years old, lived in California, worked in California or a neighboring state or did not work, and who gave birth between 20. Workers were first eligible on July 1, 2004, meaning that women who gave birth in the third quarter of 2004 could immediately take up the leave, whereas women who'd given birth earlier in the year could opt into leave starting in July but not immediately after their child’s birth. California workers in the private sector were almost universally eligible. PFLA offers paid family leave to both men and women at a rate of 55 percent of pre-birth earnings at a weekly cap, which was $603 per week in 2004. PFLA brought the total paid leave for a normal birth in California to 16 weeks: ten weeks through TDI and six weeks through PFLA. In 2002, California passed the PFLA, which offered six weeks of partially paid leave to care for a newborn, newly adopted child, or seriously ill family member and which became effective on July 1, 2004. This was followed by the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which provided 12 weeks of unpaid leave to eligible workers in some industries. family leave legislation was the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which created nearly universal paid leave through temporary disability insurance (TDI) in five states including California. This means we are not confident that the estimated effects are attributable to the PFLA other factors are likely to have contributed. Specifically, demographic data on race and ethnicity were not available in the tax data. The quality of causal evidence presented in this report is low because the authors did not demonstrate that the groups being compared were similar on all potentially important characteristics before the intervention. The study suggested that the PFLA increased take-up of paid leave by about 18 percentage points but had no impact on mothers’ employment, wage earnings, or self-employment income when examining results for all California women who gave birth between 20. The study uses Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax return data linked with Social Security Administration (SSA) data on when each child was born. The authors use a time series analysis to compare outcomes from 2001 through 2015 for California mothers who gave birth before and after the implementation of PFLA. The study’s objective was to examine the impact of California’s 2004 Paid Family Leave Act (PFLA) on take-up of paid leave, along with employment, wage earnings, and self-employment income for mothers within five years after childbirth and six to eleven years after childbirth.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |